A Stifled Voice Severs Agency, Belonging, and Hope

The weight of silence and the power of speaking up

Originally posted (October 29, 2025) Psychology Today

I once completely lost my voice, on a flight from New York to London, and spent the next week having to communicate through gestures and mime. Without a voice, it became difficult for me to express what I thought or felt or needed. For humans, the voice acts as a fundamental tool for communicating a spectrum of meaning, emotion, and intention to others.

Beyond a physical ability to speak, to have a voice implies both internal and external agency. Having a voice means possessing the capacity to translate thoughts into expression, and the social recognition that allows that expression to carry influence and effect change. Everyone has a story to tell and a point of view. Feeling heard and valued confirms that your perspective matters. Validation is fundamental to every person's psychological well-being (Paradisi, Matera, and Nerini, 2024).

A voice means you possess a robust instrument for exercising influence and power, including the option to speak out, command attention, sway others, and alter the status quo. Conversely, being silenced means you are deprived of that ability for self-expression. Suppressing one's voice stifles personal agency and interferes with the shaping of a personal narrative. Being repeatedly invalidated causes a person to question their own judgment and intuition. It can lead to intense self-doubt, confusion, and feelings of worthlessness (Gross and John, 2003).

A voice in a relationship means that within that context, there exists a safe environment for the respectful expression of all thoughts, feelings, and opinions without fear of conflict or rejection. It implies that both individuals feel heard and valued. A healthy balance between self-expression and active listening forms the foundation of all strong relationships. Equality in a relationship fosters trust, intimacy, and constructive problem-solving and allows the relational connection to deepen (De Netto, Quek, and Golden, 2021). When a voice is used to blame, shame, or threaten, even subtly, it becomes a form of verbal abuse aimed at exerting power over another person.

In some relationships, silencing happens through coercion, invalidation, bullying, gaslighting, and or dependency (Shenk and Fruzzetti, 2011). Other people sacrifice their voice to avoid conflict, preserve attachment, or out of fear of rejection and abandonment. No matter why, silencing in relationships invariably reflects a power asymmetry, where the subjugated person’s sense of identity and self-worth is diminished.

When individuals are ignored or excluded in social settings, it threatens the fundamental human needs for belonging, inclusion, and self-worth. The distress of being ostracized is so severe, it activates similar neurobiological pathways as those governing physical pain (Kross and colleagues, 2011).

Social silencing can transform from a relational, social dynamic into a deliberate tool for citizen control and suppression. This suppression triggers silencing through institutional mechanisms such as censorship, intimidation, and exclusion from decision-making. When greater society designs systems and adopts policies that intentionally shut people out, they are planting seeds to divide and conquer. The world is split into an Us versus Them reality that devastates trust, sense of belonging, and shared humanity. By demonizing entire groups, ostracism undermines the legitimacy of competing points of view; threatens open debate and peaceful engagement; and, thus, compromises the democratic process itself.

When systems suppress dissent, restrict voices, and control social participation, individuals come to believe that they cannot influence outcomes. Suppression undermines self-efficacy and fosters learned helplessness (Javeline, 2023). When entire communities are denied a voice and cannot meaningfully participate in the decisions that shape their lives, they begin a downward spiral into invisibility, alienation, and loss of agency (Williams, Osman, and Hyon, 2023).

When individuals find that their voices are dismissed or ignored, whether in personal relationships or social institutions, the silencing undermines psychological agency, diminishes belonging, and fractures the link between self-expression and efficacy (Williams, 2009). But voice can be reclaimed through both individual and collective processes that rebuild agency.

At the individual level, agency is kindled through self-awareness, self-compassion, and the building of self-efficacy, a belief in one’s personal capacity to influence outcomes even within constraining environments (Bandura, 2006). By developing confidence in one's own authority to interpret and act on experiences, you begin to develop an internal sense of worth that does not rely on external approval. By actively influencing circumstances, you gain mastery experiences, which strengthen belief in your capacity to succeed in the future (Code, 2020).

Socially, the restoration of voice requires deliberate actions aimed at restoring a sense of belonging, self-worth, and control. Engagement with alternative communities that are supportive and validating provides mutual empathy and authentic connection, able to reduce the pain and learned helplessness that comes with social rejection, and increases empowerment and psychological resilience (Haslam and colleagues, 2018).

References

Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. Columbia University Press.

Code, J. (2020) Agency for Learning: Intention, Motivation, Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation. Frontiers in Education, 5, 19. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00019

De Netto, P. M., Quek, K. F., & Golden, K. J. (2021). Communication, the heart of a relationship: Examining capitalization, accommodation, and self-construal on relationship satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 767908. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.767908

Druzin, B., & Gordon, G. S. (2018). Authoritarianism and the Internet. Law & Social Inquiry, 43(4), 1427–1457. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12301 

Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348

Javeline, D. (2023). Self-efficacy and political efficacy. In After violence: Russia's Beslan school massacre and the peace that followed (Oxford University Press). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197683347.003.0010

Kross, E., Berman, M. G., Mischel, W., Smith, E. E., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(15), 6270–6275. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102693108   

Lönnqvist, J. E., Kubin, E., & Hietanen, J. K. (2021). “The new state that we are building”: Authoritarianism and system justification in post-conflict societies. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 845033. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.845033

Paradisi, M., Matera, C., & Nerini, A. (2024). Feeling Important, Feeling Well: The Association Between Mattering and Well-being: A Meta-analysis Study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 25(1), 1–27. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-024-00720-3

Pinheiro, A. P. (2025). Behind a Voice There is a Speaker: Why Vocal Emotion Research Needs to Become ‘Personal’. Affective Science, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-025-00317-w

Shenk, C. E., & Fruzzetti, A. E. (2011). The impact of validating and invalidating responses on emotional reactivity. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2011.30.2.163

Solak, N., Tamir, M., Sümer, N., Jost, J. T., & Halperin, E. (2021). Expressive suppression as an obstacle to social change: Linking system justification, emotion regulation, and collective action. Motivation and Emotion, 45(5), 661–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09883-5

Williams, M., Osman, M. & Hyon, C. (2023). Understanding the Psychological Impact of Oppression Using the Trauma Symptoms of Discrimination Scale. Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). doi: 10.1177/24705470221149511. PMID: 36683843; PMCID: PMC9850126.